Prejudice Meaning In Hindi
Prejudice Meaning In Hindi. Along with the hindi meaning of prejudice, multiple definitions are also stated to provide a complete. Prejudice ka matalab hindi me kya hai (prejudice का हिंदी में मतलब ).
The relationship between a sign along with the significance of the sign can be called"the theory behind meaning. For this piece, we will be discussing the problems with truth conditional theories of meaning, Grice's study of meaning-of-the-speaker, and the semantic theories of Tarski. We will also look at argument against Tarski's notion of truth.
Arguments against the truth-based theories of significance
Truth-conditional theories of understanding claim that meaning is the result on the truthful conditions. This theory, however, limits definition to the linguistic phenomena. The argument of Davidson is that truth-values aren't always true. We must therefore be able to discern between truth-values and a simple assertion.
Epistemic Determination Argument Epistemic Determination Argument attempts to justify truth-conditional theories about meaning. It relies on two fundamental assumptions: omniscience of nonlinguistic facts, and understanding of the truth-condition. However, Daniel Cohnitz has argued against these premises. This argument therefore does not have any merit.
Another problem that can be found in these theories is the implausibility of the concept of. However, this problem is solved by mentalist analysis. This way, meaning can be examined in as a way that is based on a mental representation, rather than the intended meaning. For example it is possible for a person to have different meanings for the one word when the person is using the same words in different circumstances, however the meanings that are associated with these words may be identical even if the person is using the same phrase in multiple contexts.
Though the vast majority of theories that are based on the foundation of meaning attempt to explain how meaning is constructed in relation to the content of mind, other theories are sometimes pursued. It could be due being skeptical of theories of mentalists. They could also be pursued with the view that mental representation should be assessed in terms of linguistic representation.
Another important defender of this idea I would like to mention Robert Brandom. This philosopher believes that the value of a sentence dependent on its social setting and that speech actions which involve sentences are appropriate in what context in the setting in which they're used. So, he's come up with an understanding of pragmatics to explain sentence meanings through the use of cultural normative values and practices.
Issues with Grice's analysis of speaker-meaning
Grice's analysis to understand speaker-meaning places major emphasis upon the speaker's intent and their relationship to the meaning of the statement. In his view, intention is a mental state with multiple dimensions that needs to be considered in order to understand the meaning of an utterance. However, this theory violates speaker centrism by studying U-meaning without M-intentions. Furthermore, Grice fails to account for the issue that M intentions are not only limited to two or one.
Additionally, Grice's analysis isn't able to take into account critical instances of intuitive communication. For instance, in the photograph example from earlier, a speaker does not specify whether it was Bob either his wife. This is because Andy's picture doesn't show the fact that Bob or his wife is unfaithful , or loyal.
Although Grice is correct the speaker's meaning is more fundamental than sentence-meaning, there is still room for debate. In fact, the distinction is essential for the naturalistic legitimacy of non-natural meaning. Indeed, Grice's aim is to provide naturalistic explanations that explain such a non-natural meaning.
To appreciate a gesture of communication one must comprehend what the speaker is trying to convey, and that is a complex embedding of intentions and beliefs. We rarely draw intricate inferences about mental states in everyday conversations. This is why Grice's study of speaker-meaning isn't compatible to the actual psychological processes involved in learning to speak.
While Grice's description of speaker-meaning is a plausible explanation in the context of speaker-meaning, it's not complete. Others, including Bennett, Loar, and Schiffer, have come up with more specific explanations. These explanations, however, are likely to undermine the validity in the Gricean theory, because they view communication as an intellectual activity. The basic idea is that audiences accept what the speaker is saying as they comprehend the speaker's purpose.
It does not consider all forms of speech actions. Grice's approach fails to be aware of the fact speech acts are usually used to explain the meaning of sentences. This means that the concept of a word is decreased to the meaning that the speaker has for it.
Problems with Tarski's semantic theory of truth
Although Tarski suggested that sentences are truth bearers it doesn't mean a sentence must always be accurate. Instead, he tried to define what is "true" in a specific context. His theory has become an integral component of modern logic, and is classified as a correspondence or deflationary theory.
One problem with this theory to be true is that the concept cannot be applied to a natural language. This is due to Tarski's undefinability concept, which affirms that no bilingual language has its own unique truth predicate. Even though English may appear to be an in the middle of this principle however, it is not in conflict with Tarski's stance that natural languages are closed semantically.
However, Tarski leaves many implicit limitations on his theory. For instance the theory cannot contain false statements or instances of the form T. In other words, any theory should be able to overcome it being subject to the Liar paradox. Another issue with Tarski's concept is that it is not consistent with the work of traditional philosophers. Furthermore, it's not able explain all truthful situations in traditional sense. This is the biggest problem for any theory of truth.
Another issue is that Tarski's definitions is based on notions drawn from set theory as well as syntax. These are not appropriate for a discussion of endless languages. Henkin's method of speaking is valid, but it doesn't support Tarski's theory of truth.
A definition like Tarski's of what is truth difficult to comprehend because it doesn't consider the complexity of the truth. For instance, truth cannot be an axiom in an interpretation theory as Tarski's axioms don't help explain the nature of primitives. Furthermore, his definition for truth isn't in accordance with the notion of truth in understanding theories.
But, these issues are not a reason to stop Tarski from applying its definition of the word truth, and it doesn't belong to the definition of'satisfaction. The actual definition of truth isn't so easy to define and relies on the particularities of object language. If you're interested in knowing more, take a look at Thoralf Skolem's 1919 article.
Some issues with Grice's study of sentence-meaning
The problems with Grice's understanding of the meaning of sentences can be summed up in two principal points. The first is that the motive of the speaker should be understood. Second, the speaker's wording must be accompanied with evidence that proves the intended outcome. However, these requirements aren't being met in all cases.
This problem can be solved by changing the way Grice analyzes sentence meaning to consider the significance of sentences that are not based on intention. This analysis is also based on the premise which sentences are complex entities that have several basic elements. This is why the Gricean analysis fails to recognize oppositional examples.
This particular criticism is problematic when considering Grice's distinctions between meaning of the speaker and sentence. This distinction is the foundational element of any naturalistically respectable account of sentence-meaning. The theory is also fundamental for the concept of conversational implicature. It was in 1957 that Grice gave a foundational theory for meaning, which he elaborated in subsequent articles. The principle idea behind the concept of meaning in Grice's research is to focus on the speaker's intent in determining what the speaker is trying to communicate.
Another problem with Grice's analysis is that it doesn't account for intuitive communication. For example, in Grice's example, it's not entirely clear what Andy thinks when he declares that Bob is unfaithful and unfaithful to wife. However, there are plenty of examples of intuition-based communication that cannot be explained by Grice's explanation.
The central claim of Grice's approach is that a speaker's intention must be to provoke an emotion in people. But this claim is not necessarily logically sound. Grice sets the cutoff upon the basis of the different cognitive capabilities of the partner and on the nature of communication.
Grice's theory of sentence-meaning is not very plausible, although it's an interesting explanation. Other researchers have created more detailed explanations of meaning, but they seem less plausible. Additionally, Grice views communication as a rational activity. People reason about their beliefs by being aware of the speaker's intentions.
The correct meaning of prejudice in hindi is पूर्वागह. Prejudice meaning in english 1. I know that there are certain prejudices against me.मैं जानता हूं कि मेरे विरूद्ध.
Prejudice Ka Matlab In Hindi.
Click for more examples 1. Website for synonyms, antonyms, verb conjugations and translations. Meaning of prejudice in hindi types of prejudice in hindi.
Definitions And Meaning Of Prejudiced In Hindi, Translation Of Prejudiced In Hindi Language With Similar And Opposite Words.
(prejudice meaning in hindi) prejudice क्या है? A regulation that operated to the bias. I know that there are certain prejudices against me.मैं जानता हूं कि मेरे विरूद्ध.
Explore Urdupoint Dictionary To Find Out More Meanings, Definitions, Synonyms And.
There are 50 example sentences for prejudice. मैं जानता हूं कि मेरे विरूद्ध कुछ खास पूर्वाग्रह हैं. Prejudice ka matalab hindi me kya hai (prejudice का हिंदी में मतलब ).
Other Hindi Meaning Of Prejudice As Verb। प्रेज्यूडिस का अन्य हिन्दी अर्थ के क्रिया के रूप में Synonyms Of Prejudice In English। प्रेज्यूडिस के समानार्थी शब्द.
The warfare in opposition to prejudice is endless. ‘prejudice’ means a decision or opinion that is already made without knowledge or examination of the facts. An unfair and unreasonable opinion or feeling, especially when formed without enough thought or….
Get The Meaning Of Prejudice In Hindi With Usage, Synonyms, Antonyms & Pronunciation.
It is written as vikretā in roman. Looking for the meaning of prejudice in hindi? I know that there are certain prejudices against me.
Post a Comment for "Prejudice Meaning In Hindi"