Apologize Meaning In Hindi

January 14, 2023 Post a Comment

Apologize Meaning In Hindi. I apologize शब्द का अर्थ है “मैं क्षमा प्रार्थी हूं” अर्थात ,मैं क्षमा मांगती हूं।, इसे क्या समझते हैं किसी अपराध के लिए किसी प्रकार का शोक. Know apologize meaning in hindi and translation in hindi.

Apologize meaning in Hindi with sentence examples Apologize का हिंदी from www.youtube.com

The Problems With The Truthfulness-Conditional Theory of Meaning
The relationship between a sign as well as its significance is called"the theory of Meaning. The article we will be discussing the problems with truth conditional theories on meaning, Grice's understanding of meanings given by the speaker, as well as Tarski's semantic theory of truth. We will also consider argument against Tarski's notion of truth.

Arguments against truth-conditional theories of significance
Truth-conditional theories of Meaning claim that meaning is the result of the conditions of truth. This theory, however, limits understanding to the linguistic processes. The argument of Davidson is that truth-values might not be correct. In other words, we have to be able distinguish between truth values and a plain assertion.
Epistemic Determination Argument Epistemic Determination Argument attempts to justify truth-conditional theories about meaning. It rests on two main theories: omniscience regarding non-linguistic facts and understanding of the truth condition. However, Daniel Cohnitz has argued against these assumptions. This argument therefore has no merit.
Another problem that can be found in these theories is the incredibility of meaning. However, this concern is tackled by a mentalist study. In this method, meaning can be examined in the terms of mental representation, instead of the meaning intended. For example an individual can have different meanings for the same word when the same person uses the same word in several different settings, but the meanings of those words could be identical in the event that the speaker uses the same word in 2 different situations.

Although most theories of meaning try to explain significance in regards to mental substance, non-mentalist theories are often pursued. It could be due being skeptical of theories of mentalists. It is also possible that they are pursued for those who hold mental representation should be analysed in terms of linguistic representation.
Another key advocate of this belief One of the most prominent defenders is Robert Brandom. He believes that the significance of a sentence determined by its social context, and that speech acts comprised of a sentence can be considered appropriate in the context in the situation in which they're employed. So, he's developed the concept of pragmatics to explain sentence meanings through the use of cultural normative values and practices.

Probleme with Grice's approach to speaker-meaning
Grice's analysis of speaker meaning places significant emphasis on the utterer's intent and their relationship to the significance of the sentence. He claims that intention is a complex mental state that must be considered in order to grasp the meaning of the sentence. This analysis, however, violates speaker centrism by analyzing U-meaning without M-intentions. Furthermore, Grice fails to account for the notion that M-intentions cannot be constrained to just two or one.
Additionally, Grice's analysis doesn't take into consideration some critical instances of intuitive communication. For instance, in the photograph example from earlier, a speaker does not make clear if the message was directed at Bob the wife of his. This is a problem as Andy's picture doesn't show whether Bob as well as his spouse is not faithful.
Although Grice believes speaking-meaning is more fundamental than sentence-meanings, there is some debate to be had. In reality, the distinction is essential to the naturalistic integrity of nonnatural meaning. Indeed, Grice's goal is to give naturalistic explanations for this kind of non-natural significance.

To appreciate a gesture of communication you must know that the speaker's intent, and the intention is an intricate embedding of intents and beliefs. Yet, we do not make elaborate inferences regarding mental states in regular exchanges of communication. Therefore, Grice's model of speaker-meaning doesn't align with the real psychological processes that are involved in communication.
While Grice's story of speaker-meaning is a plausible description about the processing, it is still far from being complete. Others, such as Bennett, Loar, and Schiffer have proposed more thorough explanations. These explanations, however, may undermine the credibility and validity of Gricean theory, because they treat communication as an act of rationality. In essence, people believe in what a speaker says because they know the speaker's purpose.
Additionally, it fails to account for all types of speech act. Grice's analysis fails to account for the fact that speech acts are usually employed to explain the significance of a sentence. This means that the nature of a sentence has been reduced to its speaker's meaning.

The semantic theory of Tarski's is not working. of truth
While Tarski asserted that sentences are truth bearers This doesn't mean any sentence is always accurate. Instead, he attempted define what is "true" in a specific context. His theory has since become a central part of modern logic and is classified as deflationary or correspondence theory.
One issue with the doctrine for truth is it is unable to be applied to any natural language. The reason for this is Tarski's undefinability theorem. It claims that no bivalent one has the ability to contain its own truth predicate. While English may seem to be an exception to this rule, this does not conflict in Tarski's opinion that natural languages are closed semantically.
But, Tarski leaves many implicit constraints on his theory. For example the theory cannot contain false statements or instances of the form T. Also, theories should not create being a victim of the Liar paradox. Another problem with Tarski's theory is that it is not congruous with the work done by traditional philosophers. Furthermore, it cannot explain each and every case of truth in terms of the common sense. This is one of the major problems for any theory that claims to be truthful.

Another issue is that Tarski's definitions of truth demands the use of concepts drawn from set theory as well as syntax. These are not the best choices when looking at infinite languages. Henkin's style for language is valid, but this does not align with Tarski's idea of the truth.
This definition by the philosopher Tarski also insufficient because it fails to make sense of the complexity of the truth. For instance, truth does not be predicate in the interpretation theories, and Tarski's theories of axioms can't provide a rational explanation for the meaning of primitives. Additionally, his definition of truth is not consistent with the notion of truth in interpretation theories.
However, these challenges cannot stop Tarski using an understanding of truth that he has developed and it doesn't be a part of the'satisfaction' definition. Actually, the actual concept of truth is more simple and is based on the specifics of the language of objects. If you're interested to know more, take a look at Thoralf Skolem's 1919 paper.

Probleme with Grice's assessment of sentence-meaning
The issues with Grice's method of analysis on sentence meaning can be summed up in two principal points. In the first place, the intention of the speaker should be understood. Furthermore, the words spoken by the speaker is to be supported by evidence that shows the intended outcome. However, these criteria aren't fully met in all cases.
This problem can be solved by changing Grice's understanding of sentence meaning to consider the meaning of sentences that don't have intention. This analysis also rests upon the idea of sentences being complex entities that have many basic components. Accordingly, the Gricean analysis is not able to capture examples that are counterexamples.

This assertion is particularly problematic with regard to Grice's distinctions between speaker-meaning and sentence-meaning. This distinction is essential to any naturalistically acceptable account of the meaning of a sentence. It is also necessary to the notion of conversational implicature. The year was 1957. Grice developed a simple theory about meaning that was further developed in subsequent writings. The basic notion of the concept of meaning in Grice's research is to take into account the speaker's intention in understanding what the speaker intends to convey.
Another issue with Grice's approach is that it doesn't take into account intuitive communication. For example, in Grice's example, it's not entirely clear what Andy believes when he states that Bob is unfaithful with his wife. However, there are a lot of alternatives to intuitive communication examples that do not fit into Grice's theory.

The basic premise of Grice's theory is that the speaker must be aiming to trigger an emotion in those in the crowd. However, this argument isn't necessarily logically sound. Grice fixates the cutoff by relying on indeterminate cognitive capacities of the speaker and the nature communication.
Grice's analysis of sentence-meaning isn't particularly plausible, however, it's an conceivable explanation. Other researchers have created better explanations for meaning, however, they appear less plausible. In addition, Grice views communication as the activity of rationality. Audiences justify their beliefs because they are aware of the message being communicated by the speaker.

मैं माफी चाहता हूं आपका अनुग्रह।. Your friends the others i apologize. क्षमा मांगना। इसका उद्देश्य मात्र क्षमा.

An Expression Of Regret At Having Caused Trouble.

Explore urdupoint dictionary to find out more meanings, definitions, synonyms and antonyms of the word apologies. It was an apology for a meal. She has been quick to defuse the tension , but has held back from offering an apology.

Apologize Definition, Pronuniation, Antonyms, Synonyms And Example Sentences In Hindi.

Apologise meaning in hindi : Get meaning and translation of apologize in hindi language with grammar,antonyms,synonyms and sentence usages by shabdkhoj. क्षमा मांगना बिनती करना खेद प्रकट करना क.