Hindi Meaning Of Lead
Hindi Meaning Of Lead. Bluish white when freshly cut but tarnishes readily to. Lead meaning in hindi (lead का हिंदी में मतलब).

The relation between a sign to its intended meaning can be known as"the theory" of the meaning. For this piece, we'll look at the difficulties with truth-conditional theories of meaning. We will also discuss Grice's analysis of the meaning of the speaker and that of Tarski's semantic theorem of truth. We will also analyze opposition to Tarski's theory truth.
Arguments against the truth-based theories of significance
Truth-conditional theories on meaning state that meaning is a function of the truth-conditions. However, this theory limits meaning to the phenomena of language. Davidson's argument essentially argues that truth values are not always truthful. So, it is essential to be able differentiate between truth values and a plain statement.
The Epistemic Determination Argument is a way to establish truth-conditional theories for meaning. It is based upon two basic foundational assumptions: omniscience over nonlinguistic facts and the understanding of the truth condition. However, Daniel Cohnitz has argued against these premises. Therefore, this argument has no merit.
Another concern that people have with these theories is the implausibility of meaning. This issue can be addressed by mentalist analyses. This way, meaning is considered in regards to a representation of the mental rather than the intended meaning. For example, a person can find different meanings to the term when the same person uses the same word in the context of two distinct contexts but the meanings of those words can be the same regardless of whether the speaker is using the same phrase in both contexts.
Though the vast majority of theories that are based on the foundation of interpretation attempt to explain the nature of how meaning is constructed in the terms of content in mentality, other theories are sometimes pursued. This may be due to suspicion of mentalist theories. It is also possible that they are pursued through those who feel mental representation should be considered in terms of the representation of language.
Another important advocate for this view An additional defender Robert Brandom. This philosopher believes that the purpose of a statement is dependent on its social context and that all speech acts related to sentences are appropriate in the context in that they are employed. This is why he developed the concept of pragmatics to explain the meanings of sentences based on rules of engagement and normative status.
Probleme with Grice's approach to speaker-meaning
Grice's analysis of speaker meaning places particular emphasis on utterer's intention and the relationship to the meaning of the statement. He believes that intention is an abstract mental state that must be understood in order to comprehend the meaning of an utterance. Yet, this analysis violates speaker centrism by studying U-meaning without considering M-intentions. Additionally, Grice fails to account for the issue that M intentions are not limited to one or two.
In addition, Grice's model does not take into account some important instances of intuitive communication. For example, in the photograph example that we discussed earlier, the speaker does not make clear if the message was directed at Bob the wife of his. This is a problem because Andy's picture doesn't show the fact that Bob or even his wife is not loyal.
Although Grice believes that speaker-meaning is more essential than sentence-meaning, there is some debate to be had. In actual fact, this difference is essential to an understanding of the naturalistic validity of the non-natural meaning. Indeed, Grice's aim is to offer naturalistic explanations for this kind of non-natural meaning.
To fully comprehend a verbal act one must comprehend how the speaker intends to communicate, as that intention is complex in its embedding of intentions and beliefs. Yet, we rarely make sophisticated inferences about mental states in simple exchanges. In the end, Grice's assessment of meaning of the speaker is not compatible with the real psychological processes that are involved in learning to speak.
Although Grice's explanation for speaker-meaning is a plausible description that describes the hearing process it's only a fraction of the way to be complete. Others, including Bennett, Loar, and Schiffer, have provided deeper explanations. These explanations, however, tend to diminish the plausibility for the Gricean theory, since they treat communication as an act that can be rationalized. The reason audiences believe that what a speaker is saying as they comprehend the speaker's intent.
In addition, it fails to explain all kinds of speech act. Grice's analysis fails to be aware of the fact speech acts are often used to clarify the significance of a sentence. This means that the meaning of a sentence can be diminished to the meaning given by the speaker.
Problems with Tarski's semantic theories of truth
While Tarski suggested that sentences are truth bearers However, this doesn't mean it is necessary for a sentence to always be accurate. Instead, he sought out to define what is "true" in a specific context. His theory has become an integral component of modern logic and is classified as a deflationary theory or correspondence theory.
One of the problems with the theory on truth lies in the fact it can't be applied to any natural language. This issue is caused by Tarski's undefinabilitytheorem, which states that no bivalent dialect can contain its own truth predicate. Although English may appear to be an in the middle of this principle but it does not go along with Tarski's notion that natural languages are closed semantically.
Nonetheless, Tarski leaves many implicit limitations on his theory. For example the theory cannot contain false statements or instances of form T. That is, a theory must avoid the Liar paradox. Another issue with Tarski's theory is that it's not at all in line with the theories of traditional philosophers. Furthermore, it cannot explain all cases of truth in terms of the common sense. This is the biggest problem for any theory that claims to be truthful.
The second problem is that Tarski's definitions demands the use of concepts that are derived from set theory or syntax. These are not the best choices in the context of endless languages. Henkin's style of speaking is well established, however it doesn't match Tarski's theory of truth.
The definition given by Tarski of the word "truth" is also difficult to comprehend because it doesn't account for the complexity of the truth. For instance, truth cannot play the role of a predicate in an interpretive theory and Tarski's axioms do not clarify the meanings of primitives. Furthermore, his definition for truth does not align with the notion of truth in meaning theories.
However, these concerns can not stop Tarski from applying the definitions of his truth, and it is not a have to be classified as a satisfaction definition. The actual definition of truth isn't so easy to define and relies on the specifics of the language of objects. If you'd like to learn more about this, you can read Thoralf's 1919 paper.
The problems with Grice's approach to sentence-meaning
The problems with Grice's understanding of sentence meaning can be summarized in two primary points. First, the motivation of the speaker has to be understood. The speaker's words must be supported by evidence that supports the intended result. However, these requirements aren't achieved in every instance.
This issue can be resolved through a change in Grice's approach to sentence meaning to consider the meaning of sentences that don't have intentionality. This analysis is also based on the notion the sentence is a complex and comprise a number of basic elements. Accordingly, the Gricean method does not provide the counterexamples.
This is particularly problematic when considering Grice's distinction between speaker-meaning and sentence-meaning. This distinction is fundamental to any plausible naturalist account of sentence-meaning. This theory is also vital in the theory of conversational implicature. On the 27th of May, 1957 Grice proposed a starting point for a theoretical understanding of the meaning that was further developed in subsequent research papers. The principle idea behind significance in Grice's work is to examine the speaker's intention in determining what message the speaker intends to convey.
Another issue with Grice's method of analysis is that it does not consider intuitive communication. For example, in Grice's example, it's unclear what Andy refers to when he says Bob is unfaithful to his wife. There are many instances of intuitive communication that cannot be explained by Grice's theory.
The fundamental claim of Grice's analysis requires that the speaker's intention must be to provoke an effect in his audience. But this claim is not necessarily logically sound. Grice decides on the cutoff in relation to the indeterminate cognitive capacities of the interlocutor , as well as the nature and nature of communication.
Grice's interpretation of sentence meaning cannot be considered to be credible, but it's a plausible analysis. Other researchers have developed more elaborate explanations of meaning, however, they appear less plausible. In addition, Grice views communication as an act of reasoning. Audiences are able to make rational decisions by understanding the message being communicated by the speaker.
Spoken pronunciation of lead to in. Lead generation is the process of creating interest in a product or service with the goal of developing a sales pipeline. He took the lead at the last turn.
We Rotate The Lead Soprano Every Night गुजरानना Ex:
Find more hindi words at wordhippo.com! Get in there and lead with your left. This english to hindi dictionary pertains is useful for improving your hindi as well as english.
Over 100,000 Hindi Translations Of English Words And Phrases.
Lead meaning in hindi (हिन्दी मे मीनिंग ) is निर्देशन करना.english definition of lead : Website for synonyms, antonyms, verb conjugations and translations. He was one of the leading commanders in the second invasion of iraq.
Translate Lead To In Hindi.
Find the definition of lead in hindi. Our pasttenses english hindi translation. Hindi words for lead include नेतृत्व, अग्रणी, लेड, नेतृत्व करना, संचालन, अगुवाई करना, रहनुमाई, राहनुमाई, मार्गदर्शन करना and सुरमा.
A Soft Heavy Toxic Malleable Metallic Element;
The marking substance in a pencil. An advantage held by a competitor in a race. Please follow up this lead.
The Introductory Section Of A Story.
Oneindia hindi dictionary offers the meaning of lead in hindi with pronunciation, synonyms, antonyms, adjective and more related. He took the lead at the last turn. Looking for the meaning of lead to in hindi?
Post a Comment for "Hindi Meaning Of Lead"