Yield Meaning In Hindi

September 04, 2023 Post a Comment

Yield Meaning In Hindi. Profit to be received or generated from the investment made. { javab de dena } ].

Meaning in Hindi Me In Hindi from meinhindi.com

The Problems with Fact-Based Theories of Meaning
The relationship between a symbol and its meaning is known as"the theory behind meaning. Here, we will explore the challenges with truth-conditional theories of meaning, Grice's theory of the meaning of a speaker, and the semantic theories of Tarski. We will also look at some arguments against Tarski's theory regarding truth.

Arguments against the truth-based theories of significance
Truth-conditional theories of meaning assert that meaning is a function of the conditions that determine truth. But, this theory restricts significance to the language phenomena. In Davidson's argument, he argues that truth-values do not always reliable. Therefore, we must be able discern between truth-values and an claim.
The Epistemic Determination Argument is a method to provide evidence for truth-conditional theories regarding meaning. It relies upon two fundamental principles: the completeness of nonlinguistic facts and knowing the truth-condition. But Daniel Cohnitz has argued against these premises. So, his argument has no merit.
Another common concern in these theories is their implausibility of the concept of. However, this problem is resolved by the method of mentalist analysis. Meaning is analyzed in the terms of mental representation, instead of the meaning intended. For example it is possible for a person to see different meanings for the same word when the same person uses the same term in the context of two distinct contexts however, the meanings and meanings of those terms can be the same as long as the person uses the same word in at least two contexts.

Though the vast majority of theories that are based on the foundation of reasoning attempt to define concepts of meaning in mind-based content other theories are often pursued. This is likely due to some skepticism about mentalist theories. These theories are also pursued for those who hold that mental representation must be examined in terms of the representation of language.
Another important defender of this viewpoint Another major defender of this view is Robert Brandom. He is a philosopher who believes that nature of sentences is dependent on its social and cultural context and that speech activities which involve sentences are appropriate in its context in which they're used. This is why he developed the concept of pragmatics to explain sentence meanings by using rules of engagement and normative status.

Problems with Grice's analysis of speaker-meaning
Grice's analysis based on speaker-meaning puts significant emphasis on the person who speaks's intention as well as its relationship to the meaning that the word conveys. He argues that intention is a complex mental condition that must be considered in order to determine the meaning of an expression. However, this approach violates speaker centrism by studying U-meaning without considering M-intentions. In addition, Grice fails to account for the fact that M-intentions don't have to be specific to one or two.
Further, Grice's study does not take into account some critical instances of intuitive communication. For example, in the photograph example previously mentioned, the speaker doesn't clarify if his message is directed to Bob either his wife. This is a problem as Andy's picture does not indicate the fact that Bob himself or the wife is not loyal.
Although Grice is correct that speaker-meaning is more fundamental than sentence-meanings, there is some debate to be had. Actually, the distinction is vital for the naturalistic respectability of non-natural meaning. In fact, the goal of Grice is to give naturalistic explanations to explain this type of significance.

To understand a communicative act it is essential to understand the speaker's intention, and that's an intricate embedding of intents and beliefs. But, we seldom draw deep inferences about mental state in normal communication. Therefore, Grice's model of speaker-meaning doesn't align to the actual psychological processes involved in the comprehension of language.
Although Grice's explanation for speaker-meaning is a plausible explanation that describes the hearing process it's yet far from being completely accurate. Others, including Bennett, Loar, and Schiffer, have provided more detailed explanations. These explanations, however, reduce the credibility to the Gricean theory, since they treat communication as an activity rational. It is true that people be convinced that the speaker's message is true due to the fact that they understand the speaker's intention.
Moreover, it does not consider all forms of speech actions. Grice's approach fails to recognize that speech acts are often used to explain the significance of sentences. The result is that the nature of a sentence has been reduced to what the speaker is saying about it.

Issues with Tarski's semantic theory of truth
Although Tarski declared that sentences are truth-bearing However, this doesn't mean an expression must always be correct. Instead, he attempted to define what is "true" in a specific context. His theory has since become the basis of modern logic and is classified as correspondence or deflationary theory.
One issue with the doctrine to be true is that the concept can't be applied to any natural language. This problem is caused by Tarski's undefinabilitytheorem, which states that no bivalent dialect can have its own true predicate. While English might appear to be an one exception to this law This is not in contradiction with Tarski's view that all natural languages are closed semantically.
But, Tarski leaves many implicit conditions on his theory. For instance the theory cannot include false sentences or instances of form T. Also, the theory must be free of the Liar paradox. Another issue with Tarski's idea is that it isn't conforming to the ideas of traditional philosophers. Furthermore, it's not able explain the truth of every situation in terms of normal sense. This is a major problem for any theory of truth.

The second issue is that Tarski's definitions for truth is based on notions that come from set theory and syntax. These aren't appropriate when considering infinite languages. Henkin's style in language is sound, but it doesn't support Tarski's theory of truth.
In Tarski's view, the definition of truth also insufficient because it fails to make sense of the complexity of the truth. For instance, truth cannot play the role of predicate in the theory of interpretation and Tarski's principles cannot explain the semantics of primitives. Furthermore, his definition of truth is not consistent with the concept of truth in meaning theories.
However, these challenges are not a reason to stop Tarski from applying his definition of truth, and it doesn't belong to the definition of'satisfaction. In fact, the proper definition of truth is less than simple and is dependent on the peculiarities of language objects. If you're looking to know more, check out Thoralf's 1919 work.

There are issues with Grice's interpretation of sentence-meaning
The problems with Grice's understanding of sentence meanings can be summed up in two primary points. First, the purpose of the speaker must be understood. Second, the speaker's statement must be supported with evidence that confirms the intended outcome. These requirements may not be fulfilled in all cases.
The problem can be addressed by changing the analysis of Grice's sentence meaning to consider the significance of sentences that are not based on intentionality. This analysis is also based on the notion which sentences are complex entities that include a range of elements. As such, the Gricean analysis does not take into account the counterexamples.

This argument is particularly problematic as it relates to Grice's distinctions of meaning of the speaker and sentence. This distinction is the foundational element of any account that is naturalistically accurate of sentence-meaning. This theory is also crucial for the concept of implicature in conversation. It was in 1957 that Grice introduced a fundamental concept of meaning, which was refined in subsequent papers. The fundamental concept of meaning in Grice's study is to think about the intention of the speaker in determining what message the speaker wants to convey.
Another issue with Grice's model is that it fails to allow for intuitive communication. For example, in Grice's example, it's unclear what Andy believes when he states that Bob is unfaithful towards his spouse. But, there are numerous different examples of intuitive communication that cannot be explained by Grice's theory.

The fundamental claim of Grice's study is that the speaker has to be intending to create an effect in an audience. However, this assertion isn't necessarily logically sound. Grice fixes the cutoff point in relation to the cognitional capacities that are contingent on the speaker and the nature communication.
Grice's theory of sentence-meaning is not very plausible, however, it's an conceivable interpretation. Different researchers have produced more specific explanations of meaning, but they are less plausible. Additionally, Grice views communication as an act of reasoning. People reason about their beliefs by understanding the message being communicated by the speaker.

Dividend yield meaning in hindi. She asserted that she would not yield to any pressure. Due to lysenkoism, crop yields in the ussr actually declined as well.

(वह दबाव पैदा करता है।) That’s Yield Was Unchanged.

The yield of kharif crops was not good this season. She yielded to his superior knowledge. Yield meaning in hindi :

To Give Way, Submit, Or Surrender, As Through Force Or Persuasion.

The income or profit arising from such transactions as the sale of land or other property. Yield is a verb (used with object) according to parts of speech. An amount of a product.

(यह उपज बहुत कठिन है।) He Yield The Pressure.

This yield is so hard. The bonds were priced to yield up to 6.35 percent in 2025.: The yield of kharif crops was not good this season.